1/23/2013 | 2 MINUTE READ

Nature Triumphant

The freedom to tailor a part’s shape to its engineering needs—particularly when the result is a complex organic form—might be the most transformative benefit of additive manufacturing.


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

When I stand up, none of the leg bones that support my weight is a straight, solid shaft. Instead, a bone is curved, it has a varying cross section, and a close view of the bone reveals that the material is not solid but a porous lattice.

Compare that to a manufactured component. If a manufacturer produced a comparable structural member—say, a machine component that moves a weight upright—then this part most likely would be solid and straight. A form such as this is what our established manufacturing methods are suited to produce. Using those established methods to make a part as complex as a bone would be so expensive that we don’t think much about this option. We accept straight lines and high material density as two defining traits of engineered objects.

Yet this acceptance comes at a cost. Compared to that leg bone, the machine component is a poor performer. Its strength-to-weight ratio is lower, suggesting that the man-made part is heavier and costlier than it needs to be.

Enter additive manufacturing. Given an additive approach to production, complexity is cheap. An elaborate form can be 3D printed just as easily as a simple one. As a result, subtle curves and lattice structures become design options that are accessible and easy to employ.

The photo above illustrates what that promise might mean. The part seen here was designed using software from Within Technologies (a maker of tools for engineering complex forms) and produced through laser sintering on a machine from EOS. The part represents a simple component—a weight-bearing manifold—reimagined for additive production.

How would this same part be made traditionally? Likely it would begin as a solid block. Its channels would be drilled. Additive manufacturing opens the door to a dramatically different solution, one that is more efficient in multiple ways. Inside the part, the mating ducts curve together for better fluid flow than straight holes that intersect at a corner. In addition, this form that was designed specifically to bear the part’s intended load uses only the amount of material necessary for this purpose. That makes the part lighter than the solid block would be, and less wasteful of stock.

In other words, the more natural form is better. In light of this, our expectations about how man-made parts should look and feel might have to give way. Imagine how different our manufactured world might soon start to look, as engineers increasingly exercise the freedom to move away from straight shafts, square housings and solid supports in favor of more organic shapes. 


  • 3D Printing As an Alternative to Patternmaking

    Hoosier Pattern has changed its business in a way that dramatically expands the design freedom available to its customers. Historically, the company has machined foundry patterns. Today, it uses 3D printing to create molds and cores directly from sand.

  • 3D Printing with Postprocessing in Mind

    3D printing requires different finishing considerations than traditional manufacturing. One expert offers do’s and don’ts for approaching the finishing of additively manufactured parts.

  • The Future of Manufacturing

    According to engineers with GE Aviation, the challenges of additive metal manufacturing—serious as they are—are small compared to the promise that this technology holds. How else can you make a plane engine 1,000 pounds lighter?