Reality Behind
Updated Published

What Is Directed Energy Deposition?

Analyzing directed energy deposition and powder-bed fusion provides a thorough understanding of the extra machining necessary for a “near-net shape” versus a “net shape” manufacturing process.

Share

In a previous post, I discussed the challenges of making large parts with additive manufacturing (AM), specifically, scaling powder-bed fusion (PBF) processes for large parts because of the inherent cost and build time limitations.

Directed energy deposition (DED) is similar to PBF because it uses a laser (or electron) beam to melt powder. However, the way in which powder feedstock is deposited and melted enables DED to scale more easily and cost-effectively to larger AM parts.

According to the ASTM/ISO standard for AM terminology (ISO/ASTM 52900-15), “DED is an additive manufacturing process in which focused thermal energy is used to fuse materials as they are being deposited.”

Medusa DED

Robot arms are a common motion system for DED 3D printing. This configuratio at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is called Medusa. The three robots coordinate together to apply metal wire to build up the part on the turntable. 

What Energy Sources Are Used in DED?

While lasers may be the most popular “focused thermal energy” source for DED, electron beam and plasma arc DED systems are readily available from companies like Sciaky and Norsk Titanium, respectively. For the rest of this piece, however, I am going to focus primarily on laser and powder-feed systems.

sciaky printer and part

Sciaky’s enclosed DED machines use an electron beam to deposit metal wire and build up large parts quickly. Photo Credit: Sciaky

How Does Powder-Fed Laser DED Work?

In laser-based, powder-fed DED, the material being fused is deposited by “blowing” metallic powder through small nozzles or orifices into a melt pool created by the laser. Depending on the power and type of laser being used, the laser beam is focused to create a known spot size (for example, 0.5 or 1 mm for a 500-watt laser versus 1.5 or 3 mm for a 2.5-kilowatt laser). The depth and velocity of the resulting melt pool are dictated by the scan speed of the laser (or movement of the part on the build platform underneath the laser) and the energy absorption and thermal conductivity of the feedstock that is being deposited.

Directed Energy Deposition Equipment: Click here to view suppliers

The size of the melt pool, the speed at which the laser moves and the powder feed rate (the rate at which powder is blown through the nozzles toward the laser) dictate how much powder is captured in the melt pool and ultimately how much material is fused to the part — the layer beneath as well as adjacent material within the layer currently being built. A large, hot, slow-moving melt pool will have a higher powder capture rate (70- to 80-percent, which is the best case) than a smaller or faster moving melt pool (20- to 30-percent capture rate, which is the worst case). However, the thermal history and therefore the microstructure and mechanical properties of the AM part will be different in the two cases. This is one of the challenges with DED, namely, tuning your process parameters to ensure a fast build time, efficient use of powder and a part that is dimensionally accurate.

How Does DED Compare to Powder Bed Fusion?

Once optimized, build rates for DED tend to be a little faster than PBF. The laser spot size for DED is at least 10X or larger compared to what is used in PBF. This creates a larger melt pool target for the powder to hit, melt and fuse together. Can you imagine what powder-capture rates would be if you were trying to hit a 50- to 75-micron diameter melt pool in a PBF system?

Also, larger powder particles tend to be used in DED systems (50- to 150-microns in diameter in DED versus 20- to 50-microns for PBF), as they tend to flow better and provide more surface area to speed the melting process. Larger powder particles also enable thicker layers compared to PBF, which means fewer layers to build when using DED.

Consider the nozzle shown in the figure. This nozzle only takes about 20 minutes to build on our 500-watt laser-based, powder feed DED system in Ti-6Al-4V. Building the same part on our 400-watt laser-based PBF system also takes about 20 minutes of laser scan time, but the total build time for the part on a PBF system is nearly four hours when you factor in recoating.

build time comparisons

Build-time comparisons for laser-based DED and PBF for a small titanium nozzle. The material is Ti-6Al-4V. Photo Credit: Penn State CIMP-3D 2019

Why the large difference? With DED, you only deposit material where you need it. The laser simply moves three to four times around the circumference of the nozzle to build a layer and the next layer starts immediately after the laser is repositioned. With PBF, however, the next layer can only begin after a new layer of powder has been spread. So, if the part is built using 30-micron layers, then the 45-mm-tall nozzle has 1,500 layers. Multiply the number of layers by the time it takes to recoat a single layer (about 9 seconds for Ti-6Al-4V), and the recoating time is 3.67 hours. Granted, current laser PBF systems build Ti-6Al-4V parts using 60-micron layers (or 90 microns in some systems), but that still means the build time for the nozzle on a PBF system is nearly two hours (or 1.5 hours at 90-micron layers).

While the DED nozzle builds faster, you can see in the figure that the surface finish on the part is pretty rough (comparable to what is achieved when sand casting). You can see many of the actual layers, and the dimensional accuracy of the part is much less than what is possible on a PBF system. As a result, more machining will be likely needed to finish a DED part and meet specifications. Because of this, many consider DED more of a “near net shape” process versus a “net shape” manufacturing process like PBF, but as I said last month, that is good news for you machining professionals out there as AM with DED means more business for you.

Reality Behind
I Am a Visionary
AM Workshop
The Cool Parts Show
AM Radio
AM Workshop

Related Content

Energy & Power

Metal 3D Printed Part Has Unplanned Feature, Not Part of the Design — AM: Why the Failure? #2

This component for the oil and gas industry features a shelf through the lattice structure that does not appear in the CAD model. How did it get there? The answer does not involve STL, but we talk about that anyway.

Read More
LFAM

AM System Using TIG Welding and Robot Relies on Flexible Enclosure for Gas Protection

The WAAM system has demonstrated the ability to produce a titanium aircraft part, but titanium in particular requires protection against oxidation.

Read More
Energy & Power

Cutting Tool Maker Succeeding With 3D Printed Carbide for Oil/Gas and Other Applications

Powders, parts and products are different ways the company is advancing with AM. Carbide and tools are separate areas of success.

Read More
Energy & Power

Multimaterial 3D Printing Enables Solid State Batteries

By combining different 3D printing processes and materials in a single layer, Sakuu’s Kavian platform can produce batteries for electric vehicles and other applications with twice the energy density and greater safety than traditional lithium-ion solutions.

Read More

Read Next

Postprocessing

Three Cool Uses for Directed Energy Deposition

Most machining professionals don’t like to admit that they ever make mistakes, but every now and then wouldn’t it be nice to have an “eraser” to go back and repair a gouge or fix a nicked edge? Or maybe you took off a bit too much material on that last machining pass and you’d like to add it back? Well, directed energy deposition (DED) enables you to do that and more.

Read More
OEMs

At General Atomics, Do Unmanned Aerial Systems Reveal the Future of Aircraft Manufacturing?

The maker of the Predator and SkyGuardian remote aircraft can implement additive manufacturing more rapidly and widely than the makers of other types of planes. The role of 3D printing in current and future UAS components hints at how far AM can go to save cost and time in aircraft production and design.

Read More
Hybrid manufacturing

Hybrid Additive Manufacturing Machine Tools Continue to Make Gains (Includes Video)

The hybrid machine tool is an idea that continues to advance. Two important developments of recent years expand the possibilities for this platform.

Read More
Reality Behind