AM Conference Speaker: PADT and Concept Laser

The two companies will discuss collaborating to 3D print hard-to-find spare metal parts on demand for a World War II- and Korean War-era fighter bomber.


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

Concept Laser and Phoenix Analysis and Design Technologies (PADT) have worked together on projects that incorporate 3D printing into modern transportation, but their new collaboration explores how the technology can also be applied to older forms of transportation.

John Murray of Concept Laser and Rey Chu of PADT will talk on their efforts to use additive manufacturing to produce spare parts for a World War II- and Korean War-era P51 Mustang fighter bomber during the 2017 Additive Manufacturing Conference. Because spare parts for the plane are so difficult to find, they decided to explore the option of safely, quickly and efficiently 3D printing these parts on demand. The talk will focus on their use of reverse engineering, metal additive manufacturing and computational fluid analysis, and the challenges and opportunities of the entire design-to-print spectrum.

The talk takes place Thursday, October 12, at 10:30 a.m.

Register for the Additive Manufacturing Conference here. Already registered? Follow @LearnAdditive on Twitter for the latest updates, and use #additiveconference to join the conversation.


  • The Race to Faster, Cheaper and Better AM for Aviation

    An aviation industry partner called NIAR may be the largest institute you've never heard of. But through a new materials and process database for additive, it’s promising to help aviation manufacturers produce AM parts faster, cheaper and more reliably than ever before.

  • Reverse Engineering and 3D Printing: A Practical Solution

    A contract manufacturer routinely reverse engineers and 3D prints prototypes of aerospace legacy parts for more confident production.

  • The Future of Manufacturing

    According to engineers with GE Aviation, the challenges of additive metal manufacturing—serious as they are—are small compared to the promise that this technology holds. How else can you make a plane engine 1,000 pounds lighter?