Titanium Cheaper Than Aluminum? The Cool Parts Show All Access
General Atomics’ Steve Fournier describes how directed energy deposition makes titanium economical for aircraft structural components.
Share
Read Next
Which material is the more economical choice becomes counterintuitive when additive manfuacturing is invovled, says Steve Fournier, senior manager of the Additive Design and Manufacturing Center of Excellence for General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. “I am not arguing that the raw material of aluminum is more expensive than the raw material of titanium,” he says, but the total manufacturing cost includes many other factors. Total cost determines when to adopt 3D printed titanium parts like the wing splice described in episode #72 of The Cool Parts Show. In the case of this part, both design advantages and cost savings drove the choice to adopt it in place of what had been a machined aluminum part. When the choice is between 3D printed titanium and 3D printed aluminum, Fournier says, total cost analysis tends to make titanium the cheaper metal, even though the raw material cost is higher. In this video, he makes the argument and describes the relevant factors.
Related Content
-
DMG MORI: Build Plate “Pucks” Cut Postprocessing Time by 80%
For spinal implants and other small 3D printed parts made through laser powder bed fusion, separate clampable units resting within the build plate provide for easy transfer to a CNC lathe.
-
Additive Manufacturing Is Subtractive, Too: How CNC Machining Integrates With AM (Includes Video)
For Keselowski Advanced Manufacturing, succeeding with laser powder bed fusion as a production process means developing a machine shop that is responsive to, and moves at the pacing of, metal 3D printing.
-
3D Printed Cutting Tool for Large Transmission Part: The Cool Parts Show Bonus
A boring tool that was once 30 kg challenged the performance of the machining center using it. The replacement tool is 11.5 kg, and more efficient as well, thanks to generative design.
